Published by Pablo Paz Sagues, Development Engineer
Advanced Electronics Solutions

Stray inductance of switching circuits is one of the most critical parameters in the design of power electronics and is becoming even more important for systems using wide-bandgap semiconductors, such as SiC and GaN.

Inductance Optimization for Laminated Busbars 1

The operating principle of power electronics is based in switches (the semiconductor devices) commutating at frequencies in the order of kHz to create low frequency or DC power. When a switch changes its state, it must deal with the voltage and current in the circuit. For example, in the case of ON to OFF switching, current flowing in the switch tends to continue flowing which can be regarded as an electric inertia or inductance. When this current reaches the closed switch it “crashes” into it like a wave into a breakwater wall, creating a spike in voltage. Thus, the higher the inductance the higher the voltage surge in the semiconductors. In fact, this phenomenon is analogue to a water hammer where the speed of liquid flowing in a pipe transforms into an overpressure when we close the tap (that is why any plumber would advise to always close the taps gently).

There are other negative effects linked to the inductance of power circuits, such as EMI (electromagnetic interference). For a given current, a high inductance is a consequence of high unrestrained magnetic flux and can be reduced by correctly routing and shaping the conductors.

Here is where laminated busbars come into play: the inductance of a conductor depends on its shape, the proximity of the current paths and the lowest inductance geometry given by parallel planes: exactly the structure of a busbar. When required to reduce inductance to a minimum, the laminated busbar brings conductors extremely close to each other, in some cases under 100µm.

The inductance of a pair of wires 1 mm apart and 1m in length is around 0.4 mH. It may seem to be a low value but for power electronics the required inductance is in the range of the nano Henries. The equivalent construction in a busbar of the same section would be 50 nH which is already 88% lower. Additionally, if the distance between conductors is reduced by a high-end insulation, for example 0.2mm, inductance is reduced to below 20 nH.

Inductance Optimization for Laminated Busbars 2

This was an ideal case to show the potential of busbar construction and the calculations that can be performed using simple formulas. In real application, the shape of a busbar is much more complex and must comply with many other requirements such as connection points (to semiconductor devices, to capacitors, to power cables or other busbars), insulation for the required voltage level, adequate thermal dissipation, fixation elements, and of course manufacturability.

Inductance measurement of real busbars has traditionally been performed by a lab or field testing. It requires highly specialized equipment and a delicate set up. Additionally, at least one prototype must be manufactured. The effect of small changes in the geometry of the busbar can have a large impact on the inductance, therefore it is extremely difficult to build a sample that can be modified for testing and optimization. However, Finite Element Method simulations do not require a physical sample and modifications can be easily done in the 3D model of the busbar. This allows a fast-iterative process that translates into a very low inductance solution. Furthermore, other features of the busbar can be evaluated in parallel by FEM simulations such as current distribution and thermal behavior which leads to a highly optimized busbar. When a busbar is simulated to evaluate its inductance a plot of the magnetic field is obtained. As mentioned before, the inductance is proportional to the magnetic field. Besides, a simulation allows a fast sweep along a wide range of frequencies, reaching up to MHz. This is especially valuable as magnetic flux is highly dependent on the frequency and each system is designed for a particular switching frequency and slope. Consequently, due to the simulation results it is easy to pin-point the most critical areas for improvement and act on them.

In the following paragraph, it will be demonstrated how a typical inductance optimization is performed.

The first step is to 3D model the busbar that shall be simulated. Typically, semiconductor devices and capacitors are not included in the model. The capacitors are substituted by a short-circuit that allows current to flow following the lowest-impedance path. In order to calculate this path simulation software considers all electromagnetic physics constrains, including proximity and skin effect at high frequencies. In the connection of the semiconductor devices the probe to evaluate the inductance is placed.

The next image shows the 3D model of the first busbar design. The elements highlighted in blue are the short-circuit blocks at the capacitor positions and the red element is the probe which is placed at the connection of the central IGBT in this case.

Inductance Optimization for Laminated Busbars 3

The simulation shows the areas in and around the busbar with a high magnetic flux (values in µT, as probe current is only 1 A). It can be observed that the highest magnetic flux, thus the largest contribution to the inductance is found in the connection terminal of the IGBT. The second largest contributors are the capacitor connections.

The total inductance of this system at the simulation frequency of 5kHz is 12.0 nH.

Inductance Optimization for Laminated Busbars 4

When zooming into the terminal area it is noted that the magnetic flux is created in the open loop between the terminals. Thus, why it is highly recommended to optimize this part to have a large impact in the inductance reduction.

Inductance Optimization for Laminated Busbars 5

The first optimization consists in changing the bend terminal from the original design into a flat terminal with connection bushings. This allows to reduce the open gap and decreases the inductance to 9.2 nH.

In a second optimization loop the overlap between the terminals is increased, which reduces the flux in the area. As a result, the inductance is further reduced to 4.5 nH.

Inductance Optimization for Laminated Busbars 6

The optimization could continue and tackle other areas of the busbar, but it has been demonstrated that with a fast approach the inductance of the original part has been reduced by 63% to a value below 5 nH. With the right tools, knowledge and experience FEM simulation is an ideal approach to optimize the inductance of a laminated busbar (which is, by construction, the lowest inductance structure) in order to boost the performance of any power electronics system.

Do you have any question or require some information about our busbars or simulations? Please contact us, if you need assistance.

Related Products:
ROLINX Busbars

Olivier's Twist Blog, Automotive & EV/HEV, General Industrial

Published on Jan 12, 2021


This is a really interesting and well written blog, thank you for putting this together. I am wondering how you are able to calculate the total inductance from the magnetic flux density plots shown in the simulations? Thanks and Regards, Daniel West

Rogers Reply: Thank you for your interest in the blog article. There are several ways to calculate the inductance of the busbar. The main way is to use electrical relationships of the electrical circuit created in the simulation to calculate the inductance. Another one is to integrate the energy stored in the electromagnetic field of the busbar and use its relationship with the current to get the inductance. As you can see, they are both indirect calculations and you will need expertise to decide which method fits better each simulation. Please contact us if you would like additional assistance.

Submitted by Daniel West on Jul 15, 2022

Dear Mr. Mathieu, thank you for the very interesting post. I have one question regarding the first optimization step: which open gap was reduced? To me it looks like the gap between Z-bend and bushing has even grown. Thanks and kind regards, T. Schwarzmaier

Thanks for your comment. The advantage of the bushing over the Z-bend is that the bushing avoids a double bend in the copper. In that way, the length of the tab can be reduced with the bushing; and the shorter the tab, the shorter the gap. The distance between the tabs remain constant in both cases and it is limited by the creepage and clearance distance. I hope this answer your comment, but feel free to pose further questions. We are also open to discuss any particular design you may have.

Submitted by Thomas Heinz-Schwarzmaier on Feb 01, 2022

Submit Comment

Return to Blog


Advanced Electronics Solutions

Find local representatives for personalized support.